|
Biologically Inspired
Synthetic Gecko Adhesives
Gecko-inspired Synthetic Adhesive (GSA)
News
|
Low-modulus micro fiber arrays (May 2014)
We produced high-aspect-ratio, angled polymer microfiber arrays by directional
pulling of polyethylene from low-aspect-ratio, microporous
polycarbonate templates. These arrays represent a novel substrate for
electrostatic sensors and actuators because they are characterized by
low stiffness (<24 kPa effective elastic modulus), low
Poisson's ratio (effectively zero at low strains), and very
low density (<1% of solid polyethylene).
Angled microfiber arrays as low-modulus,
low Poisson's ratio compliant substrates,
J. Micromech. Microeng. 24 065016, 2014.
|
|
GSA shearing on rough surfaces (April 2014)
A model for
the relationship between surface feature size and
the adhesive terminal feature shape was developed.
On sinusoidal surfaces with amplitudes much larger than the nanoscale
features, spatula-shaped features can increase adhesive forces by 2.5
times on smooth surfaces and 10 times on rough surfaces.
Simulation of synthetic gecko arrays shearing on rough surfaces,
J. R. Soc. Interface, April 2014.
movie
|
|
Gecko Toe on Rough Surfaces (Oct. 2013)
We measured the maximum shear force a gecko foot can attain on
sinusoidal patterns in sizes similar to the dimensions of the
toes and lamellae structures. We found shear adhesion
significantly decreased on surfaces that had amplitudes and
wavelengths approaching the lamella length and inter-lamella
spacing, losing 95% of shear adhesion over the range tested.
Gecko toe and lamellar shear adhesion on macroscopic, engineered rough surfaces,
J Exp Biol, October 2013.
|
|
Hard vs Soft Fibrillar Self-cleaning (June 2013)
For certain particle sizes and fiber diameters, both hard
(polypropylene) and soft (silicone rubber) fibrillar adhesives can
recover adhesive capabilities after fouling with spherical particles.
An analysis of the contact strength between fibers, particles and
substrates reveals that dry
self-cleaning is more effective for smaller
fiber diameters and smaller
loss functions, such as hard thermoplastics.
Dry Self-Cleaning Properties of Hard and Soft
Fibrillar Structures,
ACS Applied Materials and Interfaces, June 2013 (just accepted)
|
|
Controllable Particle Adhesion (Feb. 2013)
Controllable adhesion to glass spheres with a magnetically actuated
synthetic gecko adhesive is demonstrated. Results show sphere
pull-off forces can be increased 10-fold by changing the ridge
orientation via the external magnetic field, and that the effective
elastic modulus can be changed from 65 kPa to 1.5 MPa.
Controllable particle
adhesion with a magnetically actuated synthetic gecko adhesive,
Advanced Functional Materials, 2013
|
|
Wet Cleaning of HDPE GSA
(Oct. 2012)
Hard-polymer-based GSA formed with high-aspect-ratio microfibers
from high-density polyethylene (HDPE)
self-cleans with water. The microfiber adhesive shows
almost complete wet self-cleaning of dirt particles with water
droplets, recovering 98% of the adhesion of the pristine microfiber
adhesives.
Wet Self-Cleaning of Superhydrophobic Microfiber Adhesives
Formed from High Density Polyethylene, Langmuir, 2012
|
|
GSA Adhesive Material
Limits (Aug. 2011)
HDPE and PP fibrillar
arrays have shear adhesion stress (0.3 MPa) sufficient to deform the
fibers. Hence the fiber material strength is a limit to greater
adhesion strength. Surprisingly, the GSA maintained 54% of original
stress in spite or marked deformation over 10,000 cycles.
Shear Adhesion
Strength of Thermoplastic Gecko-Inspired Synthetic
Adhesive Exceeds Material Limits, Langmuir, 2011
|
|
Combined Lamellar
Nanofibrillar Array (Oct.
2009)
Lamellar
structures act as base support planes for high-aspect ratio HDPE fiber
arrays. Nanofiber arrays on lamella can adhere to a smooth grating with
5 times greater shear strength than flat nanofiber array. Langmuir, Oct 2009
|
|
Gecko Tire for Model
Car (Nov. 2008)
Microfiber
array wrapped on model car tire demonstates high friction. (Note: so
far, tire only works on smooth surfaces.)
|
1/18 scale model car with gecko tires on acrylic
sheet. |
Directional Adhesion of Angled Microfibers
(Nov. 2008)
Angled polypropylene
microfibers show strong directional adhesion effects, with shear
strength in direction of fibers 45
times larger than sliding against
fiber directions. A 1 sq. cm. patch supported a load of 450 grams in
shear. Directional
adhesion of gecko inspired angled microfiber arrays, Applied Physics Letters, 2008. |
|
Self
Cleaning Gecko Adhesive (Sep. 2008)
First
synthetic gecko
adhesive which cleans itself during use, as the natural gecko does.
After contamination by microspheres, the microfiber array loses all
adhesion strength. After repeated contacts with clean glass, the
microspheres are shed, and the fibers recover 30% of their original
adhesion. The fibers have a non-adhesive default state, which
encourages particle removal during contact. Contact Self-Cleaning of Synthetic Gecko
Adhesive, Langmuir 2008 |
Before and after repeated contacts. |
Overview of Gecko Adhesion Project
|
Geckos
have the remarkable ability to run at any orientation
on just
about any smooth or rough, wet or dry, clean or dirty surface. The
basis for geckos' adhesive properties is in the millions of
micron-scale setae on each toe of the gecko form a self-cleaning dry
adhesive. The tip of each seta consists of 100 to 1000 spatulae only
100 nanometers in diameter. Our interdisciplinary team of biologists
and engineers has been working since 1998 developing models for how the
natural
nanostructures function in a hierachical combination of spatulae,
spatular stalks, setal stalks, setal arrays, and toe mechanics, and
developing nanofabrication processes which allow large arrays
of hair patches to be economically fabricated.
Keywords: synthetic
gecko adhesion, gecko adhesive, gecko tape
|
|
Synthetic Gecko Nano Hair Properties |
Using
insights from biology, we develop mechanical models
for gecko hair adhesion and then design, fabricate, and test micro and
nanofibrillar structures. We aim to achieve the seven benchmark
functional
properties of the gecko adhesive system identified by Autumn (MRS
Bulletin 2007):
- anisotropic attachment,
- high pulloff to preload ratio,
- low detachment force,
- material independence / van der Waals adhesion,
- self-cleaning,
- anti-self matting, and
- non-sticky default state.
|
(left) Anolis Equistris,
length 23 micron, diameter 0.5 micron. (right)
polyimide synthetic gecko adhesive, length 22 micron, diameter
0.6 micron
|
The
low detachment force, self-cleaning, and non-sticky default state
suggest hard polymers, rather than the soft polymers
typically
used in pressure sensitive adhesives.
As reported in 2002, [Sitti and Fearing 2002]
and Autumn et al. [2002]
we have made synthetic spatulae, which have shown adhesion
similar to natural spatulae in the range of 100-300 nN.
These patches of bumps lacked the setal stalks, and achieved
adhesion forces on the order of a few milliNewtons on an
area of a square centimeter.
In 2003, we fabricated high density arrays of spatular stalks
[Campolo et al. 2003] which showed adhesion in shear
on the order of 0.5 Newton per sq. cm. In 2006, we demonstrated a novel
high friction array of 0.6 micron fibers
which showed shear resistance of 4 Newton per sq. cm. with only 0.8
Newton per sq. cm. of normal load [Majidi et al. PRL 2006]. In 2007, we showed how
the
polypropylene fiber arrays can provide shear force without a normal
load being present [Schubert et al. JAST
2007]. In 2008, we made easy-attach easy-release hard polymer gecko
adhesives which have a non-adhesive default state [Lee et al. JRSI 2008], and can self-clean
during contact [Lee and Fearing Langmuir
2008].
The final goal is to build arrays incorporating the necessary
geometrical features which have the same adhesion as geckos to rough
and smooth surfaces. |
Interesting Facts about Gecko
Adhesion
-
Gecko toes are not ``sticky'' like tape.
If you touch a gecko toe it feels soft and smooth, and not sticky at
all.
If you pressed a gecko toe onto a hard surface it would not stick.
The toe will only adhere when the microfibers (setae) are engaged, by
dragging
or sliding the toe parallel to the surface. (If toes were sticky like
tape, it would be difficult for a gecko to walk
or run, as it would be too hard to pull its feet up.)
more
gecko facts ...
There are many
groups starting to work on ``gecko-inspired''
adhesive materials. A summary of the main results are given in synthetic
gecko adhesive
comparison .
It is important to note that the natural gecko adhesive is
characterized by very low preloads and peel
strength, which is needed for climbing. (Much of the synthetic work is
aimed at achieving different characteristics
than the natural gecko adhesive, such as large normal forces.)
A brief synopsis of the history gecko-inspired synthetic adhesives
is here.
Progress in Gecko-inspired Synthetic
Adhesion
|
Combined Lamellar
Nanofibrillar Array (Oct. 2009)
Lamellar
structures act as base support planes for high-aspect ratio HDPE fiber
arrays. Nanofiber arrays on lamella can adhere to a smooth grating with
5 times greater shear strength than flat nanofiber array. Langmuir, Oct 2009
|
|
Hybrid CoreShell Nanowire Connectors (April 2009)
Arrays of parylene coated
Ge nanowires connect with themselves to form a reusable connector.
Uniquely, NW chemical connectors exhibit high macroscopic shear
adhesion strength (1.6 MPa) with minimal binding to non-self-similar
surfaces, anisotropic adhesion behavior (shear to normal strength
ratio 25), low preloading, reusability, and efficient
binding for both micro- and macroscale dimensions.
Nanoletters,
April 2009 |
|
Reduced Resistance Nanowire Contacts (Dec. 2008)
Nickel nanowires can
increase the true area of contact and reduce contact resistance.
Resistance between a probe and an array of 200 nm by 10 micron nickel
nanowires was reduced by an order of magnitude compared to contacting a
flat sheet.
Reducing contact resistance using compliant nickel nanowire arrays,
IEEE Trans. on Comp. and Pack. Tech. 2008.
|
|
Directional Adhesion of Angled Microfibers
(Nov. 2008)
Angled polypropylene
microfibers show strong directional adhesion effects, with shear
strength in direction of fibers 45 times larger than sliding against
fiber directions. Angled fibers also show normal adhesion without shear
load, unlike vertical fibers. Directional
adhesion of gecko inspired angled microfiber arrays, Applied Physics Letters, 2008.
|
|
Self Cleaning Gecko Adhesive (Sep. 2008)
First
synthetic gecko
adhesive which cleans itself during use, as the natural gecko does.
After contamination by microspheres, the microfiber array loses all
adhesion strength. After repeated contacts with clean glass, the
microspheres are shed, and the fibers recover 30% of their original
adhesion. Contact
Self-Cleaning of Synthetic Gecko Adhesive, Langmuir 2008 |
|
Adhesion of Elastic
Plate to a Sphere (Feb. 2008)
Adhesion of even a thin
membrane to a non-developable surface, such as a sphere, requires
stretching as well as bending. Dividing contacts into small plates
reduces membrane strain and increases adhesion.
Adhesion
of an elastic plate to a sphere, Proc.
Royal Soc. A 2008
|
|
Directional
gecko adhesive (Jan. 2008)
First easy attach, easy release, and directional synthetic
gecko adhesive using hard polymer microfibers. Microfiber array using
42 million polypropylene microfibers per square centimeter. Patches
can support 9 N/sq.cm. in estimated contact region with preload of just
0.1N/sq.cm.
Sliding-induced
adhesion
of
stiff polymer, Interface 2008 |
|
Shear adhesion from polypropylene
microfibers (2007)
Shear adhesion of 0.1 N/sq.cm. using 0.6 micron polypropylene fiber
array. Normal preload required was less than 0.05 N/sq. cm [Schubert et
al. Jnl. of Adhesion Sci. and Tech. 2007]. |
|
High friction from polypropylene microfibers
(2006)
|
|
Side contact model for fiber adhesion (2005)
Analysis of fiber adhesion in side contact.
[Majidi, Groff, Fearing J. Appl. Phys 2005] shows that
sufficiently long fibers, e.g. carbon nanotubes can stably make side
contact. This side contact can give 10-20 times greater adhesion force
than a hemispherical tip contact.
|
|
Verification of side-side contact clumping
(2004)
Fiber density is limited
by clumping- both tip-tip at larger gaps
between fibers and side-side for closer fibers. A square lattice is
predicted to have better clumping resistance. Polyimide fibers (0.6
micron diameter) showing clumping behavior.
[Majidi, Groff, Fearing 2004]. |
|
Effect of surface roughness on adhesion
strength (2003)
Surface
roughness significantly reduces adhesion strength of fibrillar
adhesives. A cantilever fiber model predicts a drop in adhesion by a
factor of 5 when surface roughness increased from 1 to 15 um.
[Campolo,
Jones, Fearing IEEE Nano 2003]
|
|
High
density nanofibers (2003)
Using a casting process
in a template, polyurethane hairs 200 nm diameter and 60 micron long
were fabricated. Due to clumping, adhesion force was limited.
|
|
Synthetic spatula array (2002)
Synthetic spatula array
from nano-indenting and casting.
Approximately 200-300 nN adhesion force was measured per spatula. Total
area of array was less than 100x100 sq. um. [Sitti
and Fearing IEEE Nano 2002]
|
|
Rubber micro stalk array (2002)
Array of silicone rubber stalks, each 6 um in diameter and 6 um height
demonstrated 0.003 N/sq. cm. adhesion and 60 nN adhesion per stalk.[Sitti and Fearing IEEE
Nano 2002] |
|
Synthetic spatula (2002)
Single spatula were constructed from silicone rubber (E ~ 0.5 MPa) and
polyester (E ~ 1000 MPa) by using nano-indentation and casting.
Using atomic force microscope, 290 nN pulloff force was measured from a
single polyester spatula with tip radius of 350 nN, and 180 nN for
silicone rubber. The similarity of pulloff forces supports the
hypothesis
of material independence for gecko adhesives.
[Autumn
et al. PNAS 2002] |
|
Sponsored by NSF
``Electrically-Controlled Nanofibrillar Surfaces for Cleaning and
Adhesion''
(2009-2012)
Sponsored by NSF
NIRT:
``Biologically Inspired Synthetic Gecko Adhesives'' (2003-2009).
NSF Disclaimer:
``This material is based upon work supported by the National Science
Foundation
under Grant No. EEC-0304730. Any opinions, findings and conclusions or
recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s)
and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science
Foundation
(NSF).'' (previous sponsorship by DARPA (1999-2003) "Biomimetic
Climbers" .)
|